Earth’s Largest Diamonds Form in Metal-bearing Part of Earth’s Mantle

Super-deep diamonds, which form more than 380 km deep in Earth’s mantle, are invaluable tools for deep carbon scientists.

Super-deep diamonds, which form more than 380 km deep in Earth’s mantle, are invaluable tools for deep carbon scientists. Not only do they harbor clues about how they formed and therefore the reactions taking place inside Earth, they also trap small samples of mantle minerals, so-called inclusions, within their carbon crystal structure as they grow. These tiny samples of Earth’s deep interior from the region where the diamond forms are preserved under high pressure within a super-strong, unreactive diamond shell.

Many super-deep diamonds are small, have poor clarity, and are not generally used as gemstones. However, in a paper published in the journal Science, a team of researchers led by Evan Smith of the Gemological Institute of America (GIA) and including Deep Carbon Observatory DMGC (Diamonds and Mantle Geodynamics of Carbon) collaborators Steven Shirey (Carnegie Institution for Science, USA) and Fabrizio Nestola (Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy), suggests giant gemstone diamonds, like the 3106 carat Cullinan, are super-deep diamonds formed under special mantle conditions [1].

Co-author Professor Fabrizio Nestola explains the method of X-ray diffraction at the University of Padova, Italy. This method was used to first identify the presence of cohenite (an iron-nickel carbide) within the metallic inclusions. (credit Chiara Anzolini and Fabrizio Nestola)

When gem diamonds are polished and cut, expert diamond cutters often remove sections of the stones with inclusions. These offcut diamond pieces are not normally made available to scientists, and are usually considered waste, but the team made special efforts to get their hands on some.

“The project started with our collaborators at the GIA who have the opportunity to observe a number of large gem diamonds and have access to some of their offcut pieces,” said Shirey. “Evan Smith, a GIA postdoctoral researcher had a hypothesis that large diamonds could form deep in the mantle from metallic liquid, but we needed to the samples to figure it out.”

When they analyzed the offcuts, the team discovered multi-mineral metallic inclusions containing iron-nickel metal, an iron-carbide mineral known as cohenite, and the iron-sulfide mineral pyrrhotite. There were also traces of fluid methane and hydrogen in the thin space between the mineral phases and the encasing diamond. At the original pressure and temperature deep in Earth’s mantle, the composition of these multi-mineral inclusions suggested to the research team that a much larger mass of molten metallic liquid existed from which pure carbon crystallized to form diamonds. As each diamond grew, small droplets of the metallic liquid got trapped. As the diamonds were brought to Earth’s surface by volcanic eruption, the liquid droplets crystallized to the individual minerals.

“My motivation in this work was to solve this long-standing mystery about how these especially large and alluring diamonds form,” said Smith. “Everything about them suggests they form in a special way and that means they might tell us something new about the behavior of mantle carbon. In this research I was chasing an idea that I published a couple years ago, that the low nitrogen content and large size of these (CLIPPIR) diamonds might be linked to metallic iron in the mantle. I was thrilled when I started finding the first few inclusions. With the expertise of everyone involved we saw the observations unfold into an amazing story from the deep Earth.”

As well as diamonds with only the metal inclusions, the team found additional similar diamonds with silicate mineral inclusions –that coexisted with smaller amounts of metal. This assemblage suggests that all the metal-containing diamonds formed between 360 and 750km deep inside Earth. This is much deeper than most other gem diamonds, which form in the lower part of continental tectonic plates at depths of 150–200 km.

These two observations together show not only that Earth’s largest gemstone diamonds form extremely deep in the mantle, but also in regions of the mantle with metallic iron, the first time these aspects of the largest gem diamonds have been recognized.

“The idea of metallic iron in the silicate mantle at far shallower levels than Earth’s iron core , is something Earth scientists have expected for a while,” said Shirey. “A number of experiments and simulations predicted it, but now we have physical evidence that this is the case.”

Previous experiments and theory suggested for many years that small amounts of metallic iron existed in parts of the deep mantle below about 250 km depth. Though it’s still unclear how much metallic iron is present in the lower mantle, this is a key observation for our understanding of Earth and the conditions under which it formed and evolved. Because the metallic liquid at these pressures and temperatures contains carbon and hydrogen it plays a hitherto undetected role in the geochemical cycles of these elements in the deep mantle.

“This result provides a direct link between diamond formation and deep mantle conditions, addressing a key goal of the Deep Carbon Observatory,” said DCO Executive Director Robert Hazen (Carnegie Institution for Science, USA). “The fact that it was made possible by a hugely successful collaboration between our Diamonds and Mantle Geodynamics of Carbon group and the Gemological Institute of America is also very exciting, highlighting the importance of academic connections with industry and their important role in providing postdoctoral funding and the key specimens for this research.”

New Special Issue of Lithos: The Nature of Diamonds and Their Use in Earth’s Study

The 15 November 2016 edition of the journal Lithos delves into the role of natural diamonds in deep Earth research.

Titled “The nature of diamonds and their use in Earth’s study,” the 15 November 2016 edition of the journal Lithos delves into the role of natural diamonds in deep Earth research. This special issue is edited by DCO scientists involved the Reservoirs and Fluxes initiative, Diamonds and the Mantle Geodynamics of Carbon (DMGC).

This special issue of Lithos was compiled in recognition of the second International Diamond School, which took place in January 2015 in Bressanone, Italy. The Deep Carbon Observatory and the Gemological Institute of America sponsored the school, which brought together more than 80 graduate students and postdocs from around the world. Many of the students of the school are authors in the special issue.

Fabrizio Nestola (Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy), Matteo Alvaro (Università degli Studi di Pavia, Italy), Graham Pearson (University of Alberta, Canada), and Steven Shirey (Carnegie Institution for Science, USA) edited a selection of 30 original research articles from 134 authors for the issue. The papers cover four main research areas: geochemistry, diamond forming fluids, and diamond origin sources; geothermo-barometry and geochronology of diamonds; super-deep diamonds, carbonado-like diamonds and diamondites; and innovative methods for the investigation of diamonds.

 

CONTENTS

The nature of diamonds and their use in earth’s study F. Nestola, M. Alvaro, D.G. Pearson, S.B. Shirey

GEOCHEMISTRY, DIAMOND FORMING FLUIDS AND DIAMOND ORIGIN SOURCES

Diamond growth in mantle fluids H. Bureau, D.J. Frost, N. Bolfan-Casanova, C. Leroy, I. Esteve, P. Cordier
Carbon and nitrogen isotope systematics in diamond: Different sensitivities to isotopic fractionation or a decoupled origin? K. Hogberg, T. Stachel, R.A. Stern
Olivine inclusions in Siberian diamonds and mantle xenoliths: Contrasting water and trace-element contents M.M. Jean, L.A. Taylor, G.H. Howarth, A.H. Peslier, L. Fedele, R.J. Bodnar, Y. Guan, L.S. Doucet, D.A. Ionov, A.M. Logvinova, A.V. Golovin, N.V. Sobolev
Cretaceous mantle of the Congo craton: Evidence from mineral and fluid inclusions in Kasai alluvial diamonds C. W. Kosman, M. G. Kopylova, R. A. Stern, J. W. Hagadorn, J. F. Hurlbut
Nitrogen nanoinclusions in milky diamonds from Juina area, Mato Grosso State, Brazil J. Rudloff-Grund, F.E. Brenker, K. Marquardt, D. Howell, A. Schreiber, S.Y. O’Reilly, W.L. Griffin, F.V. Kaminsky
Diamonds from Dachine, French Guiana: A unique record of early Proterozoic subduction C. B. Smith, M. J. Walter, G. P. Bulanova, S. Mikhail, A. D. Burnham, L. Gobbo, S. C. Kohn
Regular cuboid diamonds from placers on the northeastern Siberian platform D.A. Zedgenizov, V.V. Kalinina, V.N. Reutsky, O.P. Yuryeva, M.I. Rakhmanova

GEOTHERMO-BAROMETRY AND GEOCHRONOLOGY OF DIAMONDS

Depth of formation of CaSiO3-walstromite included in super-deep diamonds C. Anzolini, R.J. Angel, M. Merlini, M. Derzsi, K. Tokár, S. Milani, M.Y. Krebs, F.E. Brenker, F. Nestola, J.W. Harris
FTIR thermochronometry of natural diamonds: A closer look Simon C. Kohn, Laura Speich, Christopher B. Smith, Galina P. Bulanova
Tracing the depositional history of Kalimantan diamonds by zircon provenance and diamond morphology studies N. Kueter, J. Soesilo, Y. Fedortchouk, F. Nestola, L. Belluco, J. Troch, M. Wälle, M. Guillong, A. Von Quadt, T. Driesner

SUPER-DEEP DIAMONDS, CARBONADO-LIKE DIAMONDS AND DIAMONDITES

Diamonds from the Machado River alluvial deposit, Rondônia, Brazil, derived from both lithospheric and sublithospheric mantle A.D. Burnham, G.P. Bulanova, C.B. Smith, S.C. Whitehead, S.C. Kohn, L. Gobbo, M.J. Walter
Structural characterization of natural diamond shocked to 60 GPa; implications for Earth and planetary systems A. P. Jones, P. F. McMillan, C. G. Salzmann, M. Alvaro, F. Nestola, M. Prencipe, D. Dobson, R. Hazael, M. Moore
Carbonado-like diamond from the Avacha active volcano in Kamchatka, Russia F. V. Kaminsky, R. Wirth, L. P. Anikin, L. Morales, A. Schreiber
Evidence for H2O-bearing fluids in the lower mantle from diamond inclusion M. Palot, S.D. Jacobsen, J.P. Townsend, F. Nestola, K. Marquardt, N. Miyajima, J.W. Harris, T. Stachel, C.A. McCammon, D.G. Pearson
Polycrystalline diamond aggregates from the Mir kimberlite pipe, Yakutia: Evidence for mantle metasomatism N.V. Sobolev, V.S. Shatsky, D.A. Zedgenizov, A.L. Ragozin, V.N. Reutsky
Yakutites: Are they impact diamonds from the Popigai crater? A.P. Yelisseyev, V.P. Afanasiev, A.V. Panchenko, S.A. Gromilov, V.V. Kaichev, А.А. Saraev

INNOVATIVE METHODS FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF DIAMONDS

Synthesis of diamonds with mineral, fluid and melt inclusions Y. V. Bataleva, Y. N. Palyanov, Y. M. Borzdov, I. N. Kupriyanov, A. G. Sokol
Cr-rich rutile: A powerful tool for diamond exploration V.G. Malkovets, D.I. Rezvukhin, E.A. Belousova, W.L. Griffin, I.S. Sharygin, I.G. Tretiakova, A.A. Gibsher, S.Y. O’Reilly, D.V. Kuzmin, K.D. Litasov, A.M. Logvinova, N.P. Pokhilenko, N.V. Sobolev
Crystallographic orientations of olivine inclusions in diamonds S. Milani, F. Nestola, R.J. Angel, P. Nimis, J.W. Harris
Synchrotron Mössbauer Source technique for in situ measurement of iron-bearing inclusions in natural diamonds F. Nestola, V. Cerantola, S. Milani, C. Anzolini, C. McCammon, D. Novella, I. Kupenko, A. Chumakov, R. Rüffer, J.W. Harris
Source assemblage types for cratonic diamonds from X-ray synchrotron diffraction F. Nestola, M. Alvaro, M.N. Casati, H. Wilhelm, A.K. Kleppe, A.P. Jephcoat, M.C. Domeneghetti, J.W. Harris
Effect of CO2 on crystallization and properties of diamond from ultra-alkaline carbonate melt Yuri N. Palyanov, Igor N. Kupriyanov, Alexander G. Sokol, Yuri M. Borzdov, Alexander F. Khokhryakov

Third International Diamond School at the University of Alberta, Canada

The Third International Diamond School took place at the University of Alberta, with the Deep Carbon Observatory as the main event sponsor (together with De Beers and IsoMass).

The Third International Diamond School took place at the University of Alberta, with the Deep Carbon Observatory as the main event sponsor (together with De Beers and IsoMass). DCO’s Graham Pearson (Reservoirs and Fluxes Scientific Steering Committee member; University of Alberta, Canada), Steve Shirey (Carnegie Institution for Science Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, USA), Thomas Stachel University of Alberta, Canada), Bob Luth (University of Alberta) and Fabrizio Nestola (University of Padua, Italy) were the principal conveners. The event continued in the tradition of having a mixed participation of students, senior academics, and industry. Seventy-five delegates, including 2 BSc students, and 30 Ph.D and Masters students from Canada, USA, Australia, and the UK attended, along with 18 delegates from industry and Government/Provincial Geological Surveys.

Prior to the conference 21 people (a mix of academics and students) attended a 2 day field trip to the Northwest Territories diamond mines and to see Archean geology around Yellowknife. The field trips were made possible by the generosity of Dominion Diamonds and Rio Tinto (Diavik Diamond Mine), as well as the staff of the Northwest Territories Geological Survey.

The scientific program consisted of 34 presentations, including 12 student talks, and 4 student posters that spanned a range of topics from the fundamentals of diamond formation through new mantle thermometry methods to aspects of diamond exploration and deposit evaluation. DCO early career scientists (non-students) who presented or attended included Emilie Thomassot (Nancy, France), Yakov Weiss (Columbia, USA) and Andrea Guiliani (Melbourne, Australia). The science program was supplemented by laboratory facility tours at the University of Alberta.

Superdeep Diamonds Provide Evidence for a Melting Barrier to Deep Carbon Subduction

In a recent letter published in Nature, researchers propose that most carbon goes no deeper than about 300 to 500 kilometers, at which point a carbon barrier limits carbon recycling into the deeper mantle.

Carbon is cycled from Earth’s surface to its depths, emerging through the crust from volcanoes, and descending to the mantle in subducting ocean floor. But how far down is the carbon subducted? In a letter by Andrew Thomson, Michael Walter, Simon Kohn, and Richard Brooker (University of Bristol, UK) published in Nature, the authors propose that most carbon goes no deeper than about 300 to 500 kilometers, at which point a carbon barrier limits carbon recycling into the deeper mantle [1].

Downwelling slabs of mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) efficiently dehydrate at sub-arc depths, but may retain a considerable portion of their carbon cargo. Thomson et al made high pressure-temperature melting experiments on materials that replicated carbonated basalt from the IODP 1256D site on the East Pacific Rise. They show that upon reaching transition zone depths carbonatite melts are produced along a deep solidus depression. The melts infiltrate and react with the overlying mantle, causing diamond production, refertilization and associated metosomatism of the surrounding mantle. This melting of recycled crust in the transition zone is an effective barrier to carbon transport into the lower mantle.

The major difference between this work and other melting studies of carbonated MORB above 8GPa is the different phase assemblage resulting from lower and more realistic COand CaO contents of this study’s bulk composition. The resulting change in phase relations produces a deep solidus depression in carbonated oceanic crust at upper-most transition zone depths. The authors estimate that melting would occur to depths of at least 7 kilometers into the crustal section, and that only the coldest modern-day slabs would survive the solidus depression and carry carbonate beyond the transition zone.

The compositions of superdeep diamond-hosted inclusions provide strong evidence of carbonate melt-peridotite reaction. These diamonds form at transition zone depths, and have isotopic characteristics consistent with subducted carbon. The diamonds confirm that carbon must survive subduction beyond sub-arc dehydration reactions, and may record the process of slab melting in the transition zone.

Dr. Andrew Thomson said, “superdeep diamonds are a unique pristine snapshot of the deepest portions of the Earth’s carbon cycle. They contain a wealth of information that makes them invaluable and unparalleled tools for better understanding the interior of our planet”.

Diamond Formation in Ancient, Underground Seawater

In a study published in Nature, a team of scientists describes an unexpected mechanism for diamond formation relying on ancient, subducted seawater.

Diamonds are crystals of carbon, formed deep in Earth. As diamond crystals grow, they sometimes trap fluids or other mineral crystals, micro-samples of their surrounding environment. In a study published in Nature, a team of scientists, including DCO’s Graham Pearson (University of Alberta, Canada), describes an unexpected mechanism for diamond formation relying on ancient, subducted seawater [1].

The team, lead by Yaakov Weiss (Columbia University, USA), analyzed 11 diamonds from the Ekati mine in the Northwest Territories of Canada. These diamonds, so called fibrous diamonds, are less than a millimeter in diameter. The center of many of the stones is familiar, a gem-like diamond. But surrounding this core the diamond is studded with millions of minute inclusions, giving it a “fuzzy” or fibrous appearance under a microscope.

The inclusions in the 11 diamonds studied provided the authors with new information about how, when, and where in Earth this carbon crystalized. For diamonds to have inclusions like these, they must have formed quickly, trapping surrounding fluids and minerals. Through a series of measurements, some involving a unique laser ablation method developed by Pearson’s research group, Weiss and colleagues showed that many of the inclusions contained fluids rich in chlorine and sodium.  The source of such high levels of these two elements, combined with their isotopic fingerprint, are strongly indicative of ancient seawater that reacted with oceanic crust, that was subducted to depth.

During subduction, water, in the form of salty fluids or “brines” was transferred into the deep mantle beneath the Northwest Territories, as oceanic lithosphere descended beneath the overlying tectonic plate. The reaction of these brines with particular rock types in the mantle root appears to be a critical part of the diamond forming process.

“These results are particularly interesting to the Deep Carbon Observatory because they point to a new mechanism whereby carbon is cycled into, and stored in, deep Earth,” said Pearson. “Before now, it was unclear what the starting compositions were for the unusual fluids that form these diamonds. Diamonds with “salty” inclusions appear to be common beneath the Northwest Territories. Similar fluid compositions in diamonds from other parts of the world indicate that this diamond forming reaction is widespread beneath the deepest continents around the world.”

 

Workshop Delivers New Estimate of Global Carbon Degassing

Twenty-eight DCO members came together from 29 April  –  4 May, 2018 at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, DC to calculate a new estimate of global carbon dioxide (CO2) degassing from large volcanic emitters, small volcanic sources and diffuse degassing from volcanic regions. The synthesis of massive amounts of data was successfully tackled through a hands-on approach. Science talks were interspersed with breakout sessions, followed by more of the same.  “It was the most productive workshop I have ever attended,” said Terry Plank, DCO Executive Committee member and Reservoirs and Fluxes Science Community member (Columbia University, USA), “and should serve as a model for others to come.”

The DECADE synthesis workshop group attendees came prepared with a wealth of available volcanic emissions data they used to create a new global estimate.  Their work was exhaustive, with some of the highlights provided below.

The attendees evaluated emissions from subaerial volcanoes with active gas plumes to produce an updated and improved estimate of global SO2 flux. This quantity was then combined with their best present knowledge of C/S ratios in the plumes of those volcanoes to derive a corresponding emission of volcanogenic carbon.

They accounted for different types of emitters, including passively degassing volcanoes, explosive eruptions, and effusive eruptions and distinguished between arc and non-arc volcanic sources. They compiled data covering 11 years from 2005 to 2015, and used information from long-term monitoring from space (mostly OMI satellite) and ground (mostly NOVAC network), as well as short-term campaign data and reports from the literature. The group also identified the need for further comparisons between satellite- and ground-based flux observations and the lack of C/S data, in particular for large eruptions.

To improve estimates from small volcanic sources, they assembled a new compilation of worldwide data from more than 40 volcanoes that emit small CO2 plumes and carefully selected appropriate volcanoes to include in the extrapolation.  The group then individually reviewed more than 750 volcanoes from across the globe that could potentially host small plumes and categorized their emissions as ‘magmatic’, ‘hydrothermal’, or ‘none’.  Said Tobias Fischer (University of New Mexico, USA), one of the initial workshop organizers, “When complete, this analysis will be the most rigorous and transparent estimate of global CO2 emissions from small volcanic sources yet determined.”

Attendees also delivered the first estimate of global carbon dioxide (CO2) degassing from diffuse degassing sources of volcanoes based on the published data reported in MaGa, a recent catalogue of diffuse gas emissions around the world, while also addressing uncertainties of the data.  Other attendees analyzed subduction data that are providing insights into volatile cycling on both regional and global scales, while others considered what could be learned from the rock record.

Overall, the results from this workshop will provide new and more rigorously constrained global deep carbon emission estimates, new insights into the fate of subducted carbon and new methods for estimating volcanic CO2 fluxes through time using petrologic parameters. The workshop also highlighted the need for continued multi-disciplinary efforts in the area of volcanic and tectonic degassing to advance understanding of the transfer of volatiles between Earth’s reservoirs.

Job Opening: Postdoctoral Research Associate

Applications are invited for a highly qualified and motivated postdoctoral research scientist with a geologic background in computational geophysical fluid dynamics, whose primary responsibility will be to develop new codes to study carbon transport in numerical models of fluid flow in subduction zones.

Melting Temperature of Earth’s Mantle Depends on Water

A joint study between Carnegie and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution has determined that the average temperature of Earth’s mantle beneath ocean basins is about 110 degrees Fahrenheit (60 Celsius) higher than previously thought, due to water present in deep minerals. The results are published in Science.

Earth’s mantle, the layer just beneath the crust, is the source of most of the magma that erupts at volcanoes. Minerals that make up the mantle contain small amounts of water, not as a liquid, but as individual molecules in the mineral’s atomic structure.  Mid-ocean ridges, volcanic undersea mountain ranges, are formed when these mantle minerals exceed their melting point, become partially molten, and produce magma that ascends to the surface. As the magmas cool, they form basalt, the most-common rock on Earth and the basis of oceanic crust. In these oceanic ridges, basalt can be three to four miles thick.

Studying these undersea ranges can teach scientists about what is happening in the mantle, and about the Earth’s subsurface geochemistry.

One longstanding question has been a measurement of what’s called the mantle’s potential temperature. Potential temperature is a quantification of the average temperature of a dynamic system if every part of it were theoretically brought to the same pressure. Determining the potential temperature of a mantle system allows scientists better to understand flow pathways and conductivity beneath the Earth’s crust. The potential temperature of an area of the mantle can be more closely estimated by knowing the melting point of the mantle rocks that eventually erupt as magma and then cool to form the oceanic crust.

In damp conditions, the melting point of peridotite, which melts to form the bulk of mid-ocean ridge basalts, is dramatically lower than in dry conditions, regardless of pressure. This means that the depth at which the mantle rocks start to melt and well up to the surface will be different if the peridotite contains water, and beneath the oceanic crust, the upper mantle is thought to contain small amounts of water—between 50 and 200 parts per million in the minerals of mantle rock.

So lead author Emily Sarafian of Woods Hole, Carnegie’s Erik Hauri, and their team set out to use lab experiments in order to determine the melting point of peridotite under mantle-like pressures in the presence of known amounts of water.

“Small amounts of water have a big effect on melting temperature, and this is the first time experiments have ever been conducted to determine precisely how the mantle’s melting temperature depends on such small amounts of water,” Hauri said.

They found that the potential temperature of the mantle beneath the oceanic crust is hotter than had previously been estimated.

“These results may change our understanding of the mantle’s viscosity and how it influences some tectonic plate movements,” Sarafian added.

The study’s other co-authors are Glenn Gaetani and Adam Sarafian, also of Woods Hole.

Image Caption: An image of one of the team’s lab mimicry experiments, which was conducted in a capsule made of gold-palladium alloy. The black boxes highlight the locations of olivine grains, and the dark pits in the olivines are actual measurements for the water content of the olivine. The peridotite is the super fine-grained matrix. Image is courtesy of Emily Sarafian.

Live Blog: Trail by Fire 1.5 expedition to South America

The atmosphere that allows our planet to sustain life formed from gases emitted by volcanoes early in Earth’s history. These volatile elements are constantly recycled back into the deep Earth at subduction zones, where tectonic plates sink into the mantle. During this process the sinking plate is subjected to increasing heat and pressure, and releases volatiles. These volatiles, once added to the mantle, induce melting and fuel volcanic explosions, completing the cycle. While this depiction of the earth’s giant recycling factory is well established conceptually, we do not know how efficient it is. We can estimate how much goes in, but have little idea what proportion is released back to the atmosphere, and what proportion remains trapped at depth. This question is crucial if we want to understand how our atmosphere formed and our planet became able to sustain life. In the present-day context, characterizing how much gas comes out of the giant recycling factory is also key to understanding volcanic effects on climate, volcanic emissions being significant – but poorly constrained – parameters in current climate models..

Our team of early career volcanologists is conducting expeditions to the South American Andes. Our objective is to provide the first accurate and large-scale estimate of the flux of volatile species (H2O, H2, CO2, CO, SO2, H2S, HCl, HF, and more) emitted by volcanoes of the Nazca subduction zone. The journey is taking us across half a continent, from the giant volcanoes of Ecuador through the altiplanoes of Peru and to the Southern tip of Chile, traveling on some of the Earth’s highest roads, and climbing some of the Earth’s tallest volcanoes.

Deep Mantle Chemistry Surprise: Carbon Content not Uniform

Even though carbon is one of the most abundant elements on Earth, it is actually very difficult to determine how much of it exists below the surface in Earth’s interior.

Research by Deep Carbon Observatory scientists Marion Le Voyer, Erik Hauri (Carnegie Institution for Science, USA), Katherine Kelley (University of Rhode Island, USA) and Elizabeth Cottrell (Smithsonian Institution, USA) has doubled the world’s known finds of mantle carbon. Their findings, based on analyses of crystals containing mantle magma samples, are published in Nature Communications.

Overall, there is a lot about carbon chemistry that takes place below Earth’s crust that scientists still don’t understand. In particular, the amount of carbon in the Earth’s mantle has been the subject of hot debate for decades. This topic is of interest because the amount of carbon present in the mantle underpins our planet’s geological processes, including triggering volcanic activity and sustaining the biosphere. It also affects our atmosphere when carbon dioxide gas is released by eruptions; volcanic eruptions played a large role in pre-historic climate variations.

But it’s difficult to measure the amount of carbon that exists below the Earth’s surface. Scientists can study the igneous rocks that formed when mantle melts, called magma, rose to the surface, erupted as lava, and hardened again to create a rock that is called basalt. However, the process of ascent and eruption releases almost all the magma’s carbon as carbon dioxide gas, which makes the erupted basaltic rocks poor indicators of the amount of carbon that was in the magmas from which they formed.

“This is how explosive eruptions happen,” Hauri explained. “The sudden catastrophic loss of gas that, before the eruption, was dissolved into the magma at high pressure, but during eruption has nowhere else to go, leaving no post-eruption trace in the hardened basalt of the amount carbon once present.”

But Le Voyer, Hauri, and their team analyzed some basalt samples from the equatorial mid-Atlantic ridge that contained previously unstudied tiny magmatic inclusions, small pockets of pure magma that were completely trapped inside solid crystals that protected them from degassing during magma ascent and eruption. Analysis showed that these inclusions had trapped their original carbon content before being erupted on the seafloor.

“This is only the second time that samples of magma containing their original carbon content have ever been found and analyzed, doubling our knowledge of the region’s carbon chemistry,” Hauri said.

The very first samples containing their original carbon were also revealed at Carnegie, by Hauri and Brown University professor Alberto Saal, in 2002. Those samples came from the Pacific seafloor. Comparison of the data for these two samples revealed that the mantle’s carbon content is much less uniform than scientists had previously predicted, varying by as much as two orders of magnitude in different parts of the mantle.

“Our discovery that mantle carbon has a more complex distribution than previously thought has many implications for how mantle processes may vary by location,” added Le Voyer, who conducted this research as a postdoc at Carnegie and is now at the University of Maryland.